On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 10:42:10AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Today I plan on continuing building and tagging packages for 7.4. Right > now we are about 80% done, but that means there are still about 150 > packages left that are still marked lfs73. > A handful of those are either in LFS-7.4 or provided by something in LFS-7.4 (bc, eject, pkg-config).
> One group of packages remaining is the Xorg drivers. There are 14 still > marked for 7.3. I have no way to test these (except maybe fbdev). I > think we should mark these as built, but not tested unless we have the > HW to test. Thoughts? > In the absence of reports from users, that seems all we can do. I'm using dhcp as a client, but I haven't tested the server part. I could tag it, but I'm reluctant until I know both parts work. Will be starting a server build soon-ish, but that will take some time and then I'll need to ensure that everything is still working. That will pick up dhcp server, fetchmail, hdparm, mutt, procmail. How long have I got to tag those ? Also, I keep going on about indexing the perl-modules as programs instead of 'other'. That's on my ToDo list, but not a priority. But I'd also like to add tags to the few I've built (we tag Python modules at the moment, but not perl). Of course I haven't built most of those in the book, so a lot will still lack any tags. Any opinions about that ? ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, dieses Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
