Ken Moffat wrote: > On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 10:42:10AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Today I plan on continuing building and tagging packages for 7.4. Right >> now we are about 80% done, but that means there are still about 150 >> packages left that are still marked lfs73. >> > A handful of those are either in LFS-7.4 or provided by something > in LFS-7.4 (bc, eject, pkg-config). > >> One group of packages remaining is the Xorg drivers. There are 14 still >> marked for 7.3. I have no way to test these (except maybe fbdev). I >> think we should mark these as built, but not tested unless we have the >> HW to test. Thoughts? >> > > In the absence of reports from users, that seems all we can do. > > I'm using dhcp as a client, but I haven't tested the server part. > I could tag it, but I'm reluctant until I know both parts work. > Will be starting a server build soon-ish, but that will take some > time and then I'll need to ensure that everything is still working. > That will pick up dhcp server, fetchmail, hdparm, mutt, procmail. > > How long have I got to tag those ?
I think a couple of weeks would work. > Also, I keep going on about indexing the perl-modules as programs > instead of 'other'. That's on my ToDo list, but not a priority. > > But I'd also like to add tags to the few I've built (we tag Python > modules at the moment, but not perl). Of course I haven't built > most of those in the book, so a lot will still lack any tags. Any > opinions about that ? Not really. I use the cpan -i method and that builds from source, but automatically pulls in dependencies and builds those as needed. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
