On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 01:34:19AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I made the first set of LFS-7.5 tags: > > lsb_release > openssl > openssh > sudo > which > wget > > For openssl and openssh I removed the libexec override. That begs the > question whether we should continue to document the files placed in > /usr/libexec. I lean to no although I haven't removed any yet. > > Files I have now: > > $ ls -F /usr/libexec > awk/ code* frcode* getconf/ rmt* ssh-keysign* sudo/ > bigram* coreutils/ gcc/ man-db/ sftp-server* ssh-pkcs11-helper* > > In the above, bigram, code, and frcode are from findutils. > ssh* and sftp* are from openssh > getconf is from glibc > rmt is from tar > > If we really wanted to, we could probably set libexecdir for those > packages to install in a subdir of /usr/libexec like the others. I > don't want to do that for 7.5, but it's a thought for the future. > > > What do you think? > > - Bruce
For documentation, I am ambivalent and also to remove what someone has already taken the time to document. For installing in a subdirectory, I'm _mostly_ not keen - extra work for no obvious gain. However, looking back at my logs from October/November when I did scripted builds of a lot more of BLFS, I think we might need to do this for one or both versions of vte : they both installed gnome-pty-helper, without an override it looks as if whichever is installed later (if both are installed) will overwrite that program from the earlier install. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, dieses Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
