On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 08:01:07AM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Em 17-02-2014 00:19, Ken Moffat escreveu: > > > > add MANDIR=/usr/share/man/man1 to the install for tree. > > > > I can fix these in a few days, after I confirm that the fixes are > > correct. > > > > ĸen > > > > I used that, you even referred to, after, I was able to get the good > placement without it. > > $ tree DEST-tree-1.6.0 > DEST-tree-1.6.0 > └── usr > ├── bin > │ └── tree > └── man > └── man1 > └── tree.1 > > This is without the mandir override. Do you get it different? > I too got /usr/man/man1/tree.1 - the point is that I've dropped the /usr/man -> /usr/share/man symlink. It took Armin's post a few weeks ago to make me realise _why_ I should care : I can remember Randy fixing this on something a long time ago, and my reaction at that time was "not worth doing, we have the symlink".
For official 7.5 (unlike systemd-7.5) it is probably optional. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, dieses Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
