Em 17-02-2014 14:35, Ken Moffat escreveu: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 08:01:07AM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> Em 17-02-2014 00:19, Ken Moffat escreveu: >>> >>> add MANDIR=/usr/share/man/man1 to the install for tree. >>> >>> I can fix these in a few days, after I confirm that the fixes are >>> correct. >>> >>> ĸen >>> >> >> I used that, you even referred to, after, I was able to get the good >> placement without it. >> >> $ tree DEST-tree-1.6.0 >> DEST-tree-1.6.0 >> └── usr >> ├── bin >> │ └── tree >> └── man >> └── man1 >> └── tree.1 >> >> This is without the mandir override. Do you get it different? >> > I too got /usr/man/man1/tree.1 - the point is that I've dropped the > /usr/man -> /usr/share/man symlink. It took Armin's post a few > weeks ago to make me realise _why_ I should care : I can remember > Randy fixing this on something a long time ago, and my reaction at > that time was "not worth doing, we have the symlink". > > For official 7.5 (unlike systemd-7.5) it is probably optional. > > ĸen >
So sorry, now I see my mistake. First time I told about it, I did properly, you acknowledged, but the when including in the book, I always read as if there was a "share", there. tree has tricked me. Thanks. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
