On 04/17/14 19:11, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 04/13/14 05:17, Pierre Labastie wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> While icedtea has a new version, OpenJDK is still at 1.7.0_51. My concern is
>> that I built new binary JDK's, but that in our naming scheme, they should 
>> have
>> the same version number as the previous ones.
>> How should I name them?
>> - OpenJDK-1.7.0.51-{i686,x86_64}-bin-2
>> - OpenJDK-1.7.0.51-2-{i686,x86_64}-bin
>> - upload them with the same name as the prebious one? (not good, since the
>> checksum changes)
>> - not upload them at all
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Pierre
>>
> Hmm? 2.4.7 is 1.7 u55b14:
>
>
>
Ugh. Sorry. Noticed the date about 3 seconds too late. FYI, we should 
see u60 and 2.5.0 hopefully right around the middle of next month.

--DJ

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to