Le 18/04/2014 02:15, DJ Lucas a écrit :
> On 04/17/14 19:11, DJ Lucas wrote:
>> On 04/13/14 05:17, Pierre Labastie wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> While icedtea has a new version, OpenJDK is still at 1.7.0_51. My concern is
>>> that I built new binary JDK's, but that in our naming scheme, they should
>>> have
>>> the same version number as the previous ones.
>>> How should I name them?
>>> - OpenJDK-1.7.0.51-{i686,x86_64}-bin-2
>>> - OpenJDK-1.7.0.51-2-{i686,x86_64}-bin
>>> - upload them with the same name as the prebious one? (not good, since the
>>> checksum changes)
>>> - not upload them at all
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Pierre
>>>
>> Hmm? 2.4.7 is 1.7 u55b14:
>>
>>
>>
> Ugh. Sorry. Noticed the date about 3 seconds too late. FYI, we should
> see u60 and 2.5.0 hopefully right around the middle of next month.
>
> --DJ
>
Am updating to 2.4.7 right now, so thanks for the heads-up.
Pierre
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
