> Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 13:51:09 +0200
> From: Pierre Labastie <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Is Java AWT peer needed for GCC java?
>
        .
        .
> Back in business,
> (Solved my mail problem. My ISP had decided to SPAM some of the mails 
> and not others, and put them in the webmail trash instead of sending 
> them to me. It was my first time on their site: I do not like webmail's, 
> because you see more ads than mails)
>


Do you have imap access to the account: if so, then you could likely see
all the folders from your ordinary mail client.


> Concerning gcj, I have been pretty disappointed to see that the 
> development had stalled, but that may be easily understood since the 
> developers went to OJDK. As DJ says, the only use I see is that you can 
> build OJDK "from scratch" with gcj. Whether it is silly or not is a 
> question about where "scratch" is, when we say "linux from scratch". 
> Certainly coding in binary and create an assembler would be just silly, 


I think you just exemplified how much it's a subjective issue. May be
silly to you, but very interesting and useful to others.


> but relying on too many external resources certainly defeats the goal of 
> LFS (for example why not use gentoo if you want to build yourself, and a 
> regular distro if you just want to use the software, and so on). So 
> "scratch" is in between... Initially, that was my proposition to not 
> rely on an external resource to build OJDK. Since I saw that nobody was 
> really enthusiastic, I lost my interest. OTOH, the page is almost ready 
> to be added to the book.
>


Fwiw, +1 from here for builds that are: from-source, from a pre-downloaded
set of tarballs, no binary installer or cfg/bld/inst-time downloads,
and that are fully-configurable prior to runtime.


> Concerning Ada, it is really different: the package is mature, Ada is 
> used by some category of persons (in aerospace industry at least), and 
> it does not add any new dependencies, so I think we may have it in the 
> book.
>


I think Randy did a rather good hint a bunch'o'years back, on Ada,
full-gcc-install, and so on - maybe also including Fortran 
( "Fortran From Scratch" - FFS ... ;)  .



rgds,
akh



> Pierre
>
> -- 
> http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>


--
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to