On 06/29/2014 09:55 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> As you could see, few moments ago I've commited a "systemd2" branch,
> which contains a prototype of how I would try to create and maintain
> BLFS systemd book from single (fsvo single) xml source hierarchy.
> 
> So how would I achieve that?
> 
> Since there are far more packages that don't require any modifications
> for either systemd or systemv, it would be a bit overkill to maintain a
> separate branch, especially since it's impossible to keep up with Fernando.
> 
> I know this has been rejected in the past, but here I go again. Chris
> gave me an idea of having two different "chapter" files (the ones that
> contain all xincludes from a chapter) and let the "make" process decide
> which one should be used.
> 
> So the idea would be to have:
> 
> postlfs/security/security.xml.systemv
> postlfs/security/security.xml.systemd
> 
> The first one would be the same as postlfs/security/security.xml
> currently is, just renamed.
> 
> Packages that require modifications for systemd would be renamed to do
> that, ie
> 
> postlfs/security/polkit.xml would be for systemv setup
> postlfs/security/polkit-systemd.xml would be for systemd setup
> 
> The second one would be referenced in
> postlfs/security/security.xml.systemd mentioned above.
> 
> This would require a small change to BLFS top level Makefile as well as
> renaming the chapter files in the current book. I have commited the
> "systemd2" branch for prototyping the chapter "Security".
> 
> Only thing that would change for editors is to make sure they use
> chapter.xml.systemv or chapter.xml.systemd instead of chapter.xml for
> inclusion of new packages.
> 
> Comments?
> 

It has been a week since I sent this out and I haven't got a single
clear "yes" or "no" from any of the current developers. Should I give up
hopes on this?

Thanks and sorry for the noise.

-- 
Note: My last name is not Krejzi.
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to