On 17-08-2014 14:26, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Armin K. wrote:
>> On 17.08.2014 17:49, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>>>> - <seg>libMagickCore-6.Q16.so, libMagickWand-6.Q16.so,
>>>> - libMagick++-6.Q16.so,
>>>> - numerous modules under
>>>> -
>>>> /usr/lib/ImageMagick-&imagemagick-version;/modules-Q16/{coders,filters}/,
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/&lfs-perl-version;/auto/Image/Magick/Magick.so,
>>>> and
>>>
>>> It would be a pleasure to merge this so improved text.
>>>
>>> However, "numerous modules under ..." was introduced years ago, I think
>>> by Ken, and has served as example to modifications I did in other pages.
>>>
>>> OTOH, I have no strong feelings about this, so I could just merge, and
>>> as packages are updated, remove in other pages.
>>>
>>> But doing that, could upset somebody, so, I would like to hear if there
>>> are objections for the modules removal.
>>>
>>> Another option, we can from now on, have more opinions and decide the
>>> way to go. Myself, I would do as you.
>>>
>>> Today, I will merge, but insert the modules back, while waiting for
>>> replies.
>>>
>>
>> We don't list internal libraries and executables in LFS either, so why
>> bother?
>>
>> The only acceptable reason when to list them is when they are installed
>> in foreign package directory, ie GIO Modules, Nautilus Modules,
>> Perl/Python Modules, etc. But internal libraries installed in a
>> directory owned by package and executables in libexecdir and
>> /usr/lib/package directories, unless the latter have a manual page, are,
>> in my opinion, not worth mentioning.
>
> I agree. Listing too much is not really helpful, especially when the
> list is long. See, for instance alsa-lib, alsa-plugins, zsh, firefox, etc.
>
> -- Bruce
OK. Merged as is. And already removed from pango.
Thanks.
revision 13937
--
[]s,
Fernando
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
