On 11/02/2014 09:50 PM, Christopher Gregory wrote: > On Sun, 2014-11-02 at 21:43 +0100, Armin K. wrote: >> >> Error verifying signature: Failed >> to execute gpg. >> Lengthy post ahead, go ahead and grab some popcorn or juice. >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> For some time now you may have noticed a new BLFS branch managed by me >> named "krejzi". >> >> That branch was branched off BLFS trunk while adding and improving >> instructions from BLFS systemd and improving instructions from trunk >> (most of them were cosmetic tweaks as I seem to be a consistency freak). >> >> It's what I call a fork of the BLFS systemd book maintained by me. While >> I do not intend to push back the systemd branch I have received many >> complains about stuff from systemd branch not working very well recently. >> >> As a LFS systemd maintainer I feel like it's my duty to provide a stable >> (or at least "just working") instructions for BLFS, but I had no other >> way to do so than to start my own branch since users don't really care >> about reporting issues on mailing lists or bugzilla and for personal >> reasons, I don't want either. >> >> The branch is now in a usable state - in a state where systemd branch >> should've been - minus two packages that I have yet to review and fix up >> (and, for the latter, to sync with the main book instructions) - lxdm >> and polari. Most if not all of the issues have been addressed (maybe >> some got slipped during the merge). >> >> The book will be published online, but not as an official release (ie, >> won't be visible from main website) and will most likely be placed on my >> personal web space www.lfs.org/~krejzi rather than having a new book at >> www.lfs.org/blfs/view/whatever. >> >> But, I will link from LFS systemd pages (where needed) to the new book >> because of the reasons above and probably will make an official release >> snapshot when the time is right so the users of LFS systemd have a >> stable (as much as trunk is actually, minus the new packages which >> aren't many) and always (or at least 99% of the time) working >> instructions for whatever they need and with help of Bruce's currency >> scripts it will be easy to manage. >> >> But enough about ranting and stuff like that, I have some questions. >> >> What I was unable to think of is a proper name for new book. I went with >> systemd-ng (ng = new generation) but I instantly received a complaint so >> the branch got renamed after just few hours. The branding in the XML >> still remains but I'd like to use some different name if possible and >> I'm interested in suggestions on how to name it. >> >> Also, instead of svn (where it was hosted until yesterday), I moved to >> github and will continue to manage my fork using git fom now on. >> Repository can be found at https://github.com/elkrejzi/BLFS >> >> If any of the current editors want to contribute directly, just mail me >> your public SSH key in order to gain commit access. >> >> I have yet to publish a rendered version, but when the time is right, >> I'll do so and will properly announce it. This mail is just for the >> current developers (and possibly users). >> >> Any comments, rants, critics are welcome. >> >> I ain't sorry for the long post, but I am for all the hastle that this >> post might create. >> >> -- >> http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev >> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html >> Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > Funny how things worked for me with testing it after you got shitty and > WALKED away from the branch prior to release without actually bothering > to officially say so. >
Things break from time to time and 6 months is a long period. One bad merge is enough to damage things without even noticing them. Still, I did say loud and clear that I'll distance myself from the systemd branch after you shouted so nicely at me for a very supid reason. > Not to mention the fact that you did not bother runtime testing some of > your unit files that I changed to make work. > It was one unit file and it was correct. The fix was rather different. PHP needed additional configure switch which I forgot to add (or you say that I'm not allowed to make one mistake?). > Though I believe that you already knew when you wrote this that I would > not allow you to get away with your false accusations. > Time will tell if they are false or not. > I can assure you that I will NOT accept any of your updates in the > systemd branch in the future. > > Christopher. > It's not like that matters to me. -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
