I was not going to reply, because it doesn't mat for me, at the moment, as I am temporarily not working, but I could not resist.
So if this was a test... On 13-01-2015 08:46, Armin K. wrote: > On 01/10/2015 07:45 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> Author: fernando >> Date: Sat Jan 10 10:45:03 2015 >> New Revision: 15321 >> >> Log: >> libevent-2.0.22: docs and tests statistics and respective minor fixes. >> feh-2.12: docs and tests minor fixes. Thank you very much, Igor, for >> including this package! > > > >> Modified: trunk/BOOK/networking/netlibs/libevent.xml >> ============================================================================== >> --- trunk/BOOK/networking/netlibs/libevent.xml Sat Jan 10 09:38:25 >> 2015 (r15320) >> +++ trunk/BOOK/networking/netlibs/libevent.xml Sat Jan 10 10:45:03 >> 2015 (r15321) >> @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ >> <!ENTITY libevent-download-ftp " "> >> <!ENTITY libevent-md5sum "c4c56f986aa985677ca1db89630a2e11"> >> <!ENTITY libevent-size "835 KB"> >> - <!ENTITY libevent-buildsize "19 MB"> >> - <!ENTITY libevent-time "0.3 SBU"> >> + <!ENTITY libevent-buildsize "19 MB (additional 1 MB for the tests and >> 6 MB for the API documentation)"> > > Was the "additional 1 MB" even worth mentioning? It's not like it's 100 > MB. You could simply add it to the full build size. I believe that > unless some additional feature (documentation, tests, etc) adds more > than 5% of the size it isn't even worth mentioning. Like, as an example, > you have a package that takes 500 MB of space to build and install, yet > it contains "additional 5 MB for the tests" ... doh - just make it 505 > and be done with it. Same goes for SBU values - 25 SBU package and > additional 0.2 SBU for the docs ... I don't agree at all. > >> + <!ENTITY libevent-time "0.3 SBU (additional 1.3 SBU for the >> tests)"> >> ]> >> >> <sect1 id="libevent" xreflabel="libevent-&libevent-version;"> > > > >> Modified: trunk/BOOK/xsoft/other/feh.xml >> ============================================================================== >> --- trunk/BOOK/xsoft/other/feh.xml Sat Jan 10 09:38:25 2015 (r15320) >> +++ trunk/BOOK/xsoft/other/feh.xml Sat Jan 10 10:45:03 2015 (r15321) >> @@ -99,6 +99,16 @@ >> <xref linkend="imagemagick"/> (to load unsupported formats) >> </para> >> >> + <bridgehead renderas="sect4">Optional (test suite)</bridgehead> >> + <para role="optional"> >> + <ulink url="http://mdocml.bsd.lv/snapshots/";>mdocml</ulink> >> + (warning: this package will overwrite many files and programs of > > maybe an actual <warning> block after the optional section would suit > this better. I agree, but didn't qualify to decide the best place. However, as I wrote earlier today, *I don't care at all*, tests are not anymore my concern. As I wrote yesterday, when you want, you are the nicest and helpfull person. But when you want, you are a PITA, disgusting as nobody else I met in any list. You should choose the nice and helpful personality more often, then we could really admire your knowledge without disgust. I should not write the previous lines, so, apologies, but I am not yet in the best of my mind. -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
