On 08-02-2015 23:18, Alexey Orishko wrote: > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:10 AM, Alexey Orishko > As Armin suggested, > I've tried nasm-2.11.05 and syslinux build >> finished without any errors. >> Is a build failure related to nasm-2.11.06 a reason to consider a >> different NASM version for the book release? I can use whatever I need >> in my build, but other might also face similar problems... > > Got reply on syslinux mail list: > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:07 AM, Jonathan Boeing > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I had the same failure with 2.11.06, but the latest snapshot is working >> correctly for me. >> See http://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/mailman/message/33074214/ > > It looks like either nasm-2.11.05 or a latest nasm snapshot is a > better choice...
I'm trying to understand implications of the three alternatives: 1. downgrade 2. leave as is 3. use a snapshot or equivalent patch. Don't have an opinion about it, don't want to decide anything. Search of nasm package wich is dependent in SVN finds(no comment after a package means it builds with current nasm): libvpx (compiling with NASM-2.11.05 or NASM-2.11.06 is currently broken) flac sdl lame libjpeg-turbo tigervnc (nasm isn't actually required - will create a new thread about this) For what the book needs, current version seems to work. Only problem, libvpx, is marked as broken with the downgrade candidate, in BLFS-7.6. -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
