On 09-02-2015 13:42, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> On 08-02-2015 23:18, Alexey Orishko wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:10 AM, Alexey Orishko > As Armin suggested, >>> I've tried nasm-2.11.05 and syslinux build >>>> finished without any errors. >>>> Is a build failure related to nasm-2.11.06 a reason to consider a >>>> different NASM version for the book release? I can use whatever I need >>>> in my build, but other might also face similar problems... >>> >>> Got reply on syslinux mail list: >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:07 AM, Jonathan Boeing >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I had the same failure with 2.11.06, but the latest snapshot is working >>>> correctly for me. >>>> See http://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/mailman/message/33074214/ >>> >>> It looks like either nasm-2.11.05 or a latest nasm snapshot is a >>> better choice... >> >> I'm trying to understand implications of the three alternatives: >> >> 1. downgrade >> 2. leave as is >> 3. use a snapshot or equivalent patch. >> >> Don't have an opinion about it, don't want to decide anything. >>
>> libvpx (compiling with NASM-2.11.05 or NASM-2.11.06 is currently broken) >> For what the book needs, current version seems to work. Only problem, >> libvpx, is marked as broken with the downgrade candidate, in BLFS-7.6. Just be more clear: libvpx fails with current NASM-2.11.06 (this is current in BLFS SVN) and previous NASM-2.11.05 (this is the on in BLFS-7.6). But we use yasm for that. Therefore, nasm is not a relevant problem here and no problem at all in the rest of the book. > I'll get a snapshot and create a diff from 2.11.06 and see if I can > figure out anything from that. I have not had the courage of installing a snapshot, to find if it would solve problem with libvpx. -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
