On 17-02-2015 18:07, Pierre Labastie wrote: > Thinking more about it, fixing the book is much more easily done by > recommending g-ir everywhere than by making it optional each time it is > possible: determining the switches needed to not requiring it (such as > --disable-instrospection) would be a long task. For example, is it possible > (without heavy workarounds) to build colord without g-i? I think I'll give it > a try, but there are more urgent things (libpeas/Lua fixing again, and testing > new patch for LO).
Pierre, yesterday I spent almost all day with testing new patch for LO (32 bit). Had some trouble (always forget build fails via ssh), and it finished when I was already sleeping. This morning found that it works and newly installed LO works fine too. I will submit the patch and keep it as needed for 32 bit. Please, if you find that x86_64 needs it, fix the book, or tell me to do it, whatever you prefer. Thanks. -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
