Le 18/02/2015 11:41, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit :
On 17-02-2015 18:07, Pierre Labastie wrote:
Thinking more about it, fixing the book is much more easily done by
recommending g-ir everywhere than by making it optional each time it is
possible: determining the switches needed to not requiring it (such as
--disable-instrospection) would be a long task. For example, is it possible
(without heavy workarounds) to build colord without g-i? I think I'll give it
a try, but there are more urgent things (libpeas/Lua fixing again, and testing
new patch for LO).
Pierre, yesterday I spent almost all day with testing new patch for LO
(32 bit). Had some trouble (always forget build fails via ssh), and it
finished when I was already sleeping. This morning found that it works
and newly installed LO works fine too. I will submit the patch and keep
it as needed for 32 bit. Please, if you find that x86_64 needs it, fix
the book, or tell me to do it, whatever you prefer.
Thanks.
Hi,
Right now building without the patch on a 64 bit VM. Let's see whether
it passes.
Pierre
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
