On 27-02-2015 14:55, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > I know you were having HW problems. I appreciate whatever you can do. > > Personally, I've been building a lot and haven't had time to consider > email in detail. I'd like to get the tags done and then go back and > consider other issues in more detail. In the meantime, I rely on you > and the others to look at the more involved issues. Really though, the > best way to keep me from forgetting is to have an open ticket. I always > review those and will need to close them before a release. > > Also, I'm building on a new machine. There are a lot of issues that I'm > coming across. I was able to test bluez with a usb BT dongle I had, but > now I need to go and get a dvd drive for it to test those functions. I > also ran into an issue that I wasn't aware of when I installed > iptables. Now I need (want) to get a router appliance to isolate my > network from my ISPs router. I have some control over that, but not > enough to suit me.
I was going to write what follows before your post, but could not because was doing soome backaups and could not use TB during it. What I did was not a complaint for ĸen removing the MOZ_MAKE_FLAGS. I knew that it would imply that the machine would use maximum allowed threads, instead of the desired results you both thought. That was the reason I included tow of them and not an export at the beginning of the build. But because of the thread, I realized that FF was not mis-behaving anymore, and that is great!! Now we can go back to the inclusion not in the make lines, but in the mozconfig. Only downside is that still make and install will use the same, unless there is a definition in the install line. So, I was writing to clarify that I was *not complaining* and to *thank ĸen and you* for the discussion. I don't know if a note would be necessary, but surely, we could go back to define the threads in mozconfig. But this is not my call. ĸen did the update and whatever you, ĸen decide, is good for me. BTW ticket still open :-) I like and admire very much ĸen's posts and work, it was the preoccupation of being technically right in previous posts that gave the impression of a flame (now that I red them again, I got the feeling). Hope until tomorrow I build the new system and tag something (if still left). -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
