On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 07:49:21PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > On 02-03-2015 01:51, Ken Moffat wrote: > > [ cut my long moan about current gnome ] > > ĸen, everyday I read this post and if you have read other posts I sent > in the two last days, I'm always thinking about it. I mostly agree with > you, but am trying to get a solution between replacing the gnome > packages in the book by Mate or Cinnamon ones (mate, by prefernce, as it > is mor Gnome 2 alike), or reviving the whole Gnome, ore placeit by a > full Mate or Cinnamon. But I still am an LXDE user. BTW, file-roller is > useless for us, but people that never used a terminal do need it. I > spent half a day, yesterday, trying to give telephone support to a girl, > friend of mine. Could guide a complete Lubuntu release update, but at > the end, the wifi driver (Broadcom card, PITA) didn't work, after > rebooting, and she is deciding if will bring the netbook here, or by a > new machine running W*. >
Fernando, I have no idea what is the best approach for gnome. I might take some time to try to build it this summer, and I might look again at mate - I thought that mate-character-map was no longer developed, but at https://github.com/mate-desktop/mate-character-map I can see that there was a change two months ago. But please, do not worry about my comments on gnome - Bruce has tested it for this release, and there is no further action required. As to file managers in general, I find them much harder than using a term. ĸen -- Nanny Ogg usually went to bed early. After all, she was an old lady. Sometimes she went to bed as early as 6 a.m. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
