Em 06-02-2016 22:37, Ken Moffat escreveu: > In my current build, libreoffice failed with: > > Fatal exception: Signal 6 > Stack: > /scratch/working/libreoffice-5.0.4.2/instdir/program/libuno_sal.so.3(+0x388f0)[0x2b5874ba68f0] > /scratch/working/libreoffice-5.0.4.2/instdir/program/libuno_sal.so.3(+0x38c83)[0x2b5874ba6c83] > /scratch/working/libreoffice-5.0.4.2/instdir/program/libuno_sal.so.3(+0x38db8)[0x2b5874ba6db8] > /lib/libc.so.6(+0x33610)[0x2b58755ee610] > /lib/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x38)[0x2b58755ee588] > /lib/libc.so.6(abort+0x16a)[0x2b58755efa0a] > /lib/libc.so.6(+0x71fea)[0x2b587562cfea] > /lib/libc.so.6(+0x77946)[0x2b5875632946] > /lib/libc.so.6(+0x7812e)[0x2b587563312e] > /scratch/working/libreoffice-5.0.4.2/instdir/program/libfbembed.so.2.5(+0x56ebf)[0x2b587c9a4ebf] > /lib/libpthread.so.0(+0x7404)[0x2b5875b6a404] > /lib/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d)[0x2b58756a402d] > You need gdb in your path to show backtraces > > Error: a unit test failed, please do one of: > > export DEBUGCPPUNIT=TRUE # for exception catching > export CPPUNITTRACE="gdb --args" # for interactive debugging on Linux > export VALGRIND=memcheck # for memory checking > > and retry using: make CppunitTest_dbaccess_firebird_test > > So, I tried the first of those exports - no extra info available. > > I suppose it is _possible_ this comes from using system boost. > > Google found > http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Failing-CppunitTest-dbaccess-firebird-test-td4157175.html > which said the firebird access is experimental and (unless needed) > can be disabled with --disable-firebird-sdbc : I tried that, and the > build completed. > > Still searching after the build had started, I found Manjaro have a > patch to disable this (by deleting the line that makes the test), > originally from Fedora. The original is at > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/libreoffice.git/tree/0001-disable-firebird-unit-test.patch?id=73ecbc7997c92f483811733dcacba315edf59787 > and fedora have been using it for two years, although they also seem > to require firebird as a dep, and to use the --disable option : > perhaps differnet supported architectures use different parts of hte > specfile, I did not read too closely. Anyway, they created this > patch days before they moved to LO-4.1.5. > > So, I am puzzled why I have only now seen this (or, perhaps I did > see it in the past - I know there have been problems with one or > more unit tests). For the future, I think I'll keep the switch (I > have no need for firebird), but I'm not sure if it belongs in the > book. > > ĸen >
There has been problems when building in ssh or chroot. I had it a couple of times. e.g. <http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-support/2014-October/075800.html> -- []s, Fernando, aka Sísifo -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
