On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 09:15:17AM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> Em 10-02-2016 14:06, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
> > Em 10-02-2016 13:20, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> >> On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 07:49:09AM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> >>> Em 07-02-2016 07:45, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
> >>>> Em 06-02-2016 22:37, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> >>>>> In my current build, libreoffice failed with:
> >>>>>
> >> [...]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Error: a unit test failed, please do one of:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> export DEBUGCPPUNIT=TRUE            # for exception catching
> >>>>> export CPPUNITTRACE="gdb --args"    # for interactive debugging on Linux
> >>>>> export VALGRIND=memcheck            # for memory checking
> >>>>>
> >>>>> and retry using: make CppunitTest_dbaccess_firebird_test
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>>> ĸen
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> There has been problems when building in ssh or chroot. I had it a
> >>>> couple of times. e.g.
> >>>>
> >>>> <http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-support/2014-October/075800.html>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Found another one, where I intentionally reproduced the problem via ssh:
> >>>
> >>> <http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2014-October/028718.html>
> >>>
> >> So, do you think we should add --disable-firebird-sdbc to the
> >> configure ('the firebird support sometimes fails its unit test'), or
> >> else docment it as an optional switch ?
> >>
> >> I see you have taken the next release of LO.
> >>
> >> ĸen
> >>
> > 
> > If it fails for me, we add. If not, I will (kindly) ask you to add it to
> > page, it is worth documenting.
> 
> No error with Firebired. Please, add your words to document the
> CppunitTest_dbaccess_firebird_failed test.
> > 
> > I am building with system boost. The patch failed to apply, mostly for
> > "gave already been applied". If correct, we will all be happy. :-)
> 
> Worked fine with system-boost and no patch.
> 
Sorry, I got distracted - first I tried to use my new kvm switch,
only to find that my old server does not talk to a usb keyboard, and
then somebody reported a problem with our (my) texlive instructions
on the tl-build list of all places (for the moment, I have indicated
what I think he did wrong).

Added, as an option, at r16950.  For the moment I do not know how
reliably it occurs, and next time I might build gdb anyway (if I
remember).

ĸen
-- 
This email was written using 100% recycled letters.
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to