Em 04-03-2016 06:15, Pierre Labastie escreveu: > Hi, > > I am struggling through the dependency chain for LXQt, and I end up > needing all the dependencies for KDE-frameworks and plasma.
I know the reason. > Of course > for each of KF5 and plasma, there are only a couple libraries needed, > but nothing is said about the dependencies for those libraries. You confirm that the needed libraries are stated. Don't you think you should rplace LXQt by KF5 and plasma in the subject, so this would not be misleading for someone searching in the internet? Your sentence should read: "nothing is said in in KF5 and plasma about their own individual dependencies". I found it, Ken found it. I think KF5 and plasma are good as they are. It is not the role of LXQt to state which are the dependencies of Plasma or KF5. > So it is > hard to know what deps are needed (I may have missed something in the > book), Perhaps scripting, instead of jhalfing? > and building LXQt is therefore very heavy (far from the > "lightweight" desktop advertised). Yes, it may be very heavyweight for jhalfs. I may have advertised that it is lightweight, but surely was not referring to jhalfs. > Does somebody know which kf5 and > plasma deps are really needed? As with other criticisms I was expecting this post. There is a simple solution: tell Bruce to divide the pages so that jhalfs find them. This would not be news, as many of the book is modified to solve jhalfs problem, when the contrary should be the correct. Sometimes I think that the project is jhalfs and the sub-projects are (B)LFS. Would you please try to script this part, instead of using jhalfs? -- []s, Fernando, aka SÃsifo -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
