Okay, next opinion question. Many of the python modules were moved out
of trunk, presumably to lessen maintenance for little used packages
(among LFS users). I have four frequently used modules (frequently may
not be accurate for LFSers) that should remain in systemd that were
removed from trunk (and three additional ones). The four are setuptools,
beaker, markupsafe, and mako. Mako is the important one, and depends on
the other three. I can exclude all of these from trunk if it is desired
(and have for now), but given the low maintenance these packages
require, I figured I'd ask if we wanted them back in (since they'll be
in systemd anyway).
Additionally, we had Jinja2, pyatspi2, and pyyaml. I had never heard of
jinja before I had seen it in BLFS (and don't yet know exactly what it
does). Pyatspi2 and pyyaml (and yaml, also only in systemd) will
eventually be deps for Gnome (if not already).
Anyway, question is whether to keep trunk the way it is, or include
them? Is there any reason to exclude at least those first four from the
SysV book? For the upcoming commit, I've kept them only in systemd, but
it's a simple matter to remove the revision tags if you feel like they
should be included (or can be included, simply to reduce external links).
--DJ
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
