On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 09:44:20PM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote: > Okay, next opinion question. Many of the python modules were moved out of > trunk, presumably to lessen maintenance for little used packages (among LFS > users). I have four frequently used modules (frequently may not be accurate > for LFSers) that should remain in systemd that were removed from trunk (and > three additional ones). The four are setuptools, beaker, markupsafe, and > mako. Mako is the important one, and depends on the other three. I can > exclude all of these from trunk if it is desired (and have for now), but > given the low maintenance these packages require, I figured I'd ask if we > wanted them back in (since they'll be in systemd anyway). >
On my i7 I build the docs for llvm (well, I assume I built them, I haven't actually looked at them, this is just to test the book). And that needs Sphinx, which depends on setuptools : found a tarball for that on Saturday after the ez_setup.py I had been using downloaded the zip then decided it wasn't a zip file - and people wonder why I dislike python :) Anyway, there are attempts at the moment to move the kernel docs to new processes, and Sphinx will possibly be used. If that happens, perhaps Sphinx, and therefore setuptools, should become part of the trunk book. ĸen -- I had to walk fifteen miles to school, barefoot in the snow. Uphill both ways. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
