On December 1, 2016 10:47:40 AM CST, Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Douglas R. Reno wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:37 PM, DJ Lucas <d...@linuxfromscratch.org>
>wrote:
>>
>>> Anybody else have issue with the pthread-stubs sed? Causes configure
>to be
>>> generated with "then\n\nfi" (a syntax error) on my system.
>>>
>>> IIUC, we want to make the check not required. I believe this is a
>more
>>> correct sed to invalidate the check:
>>>
>>> sed '/pthread_stubs_possible/s/\"yes/\"no/' -i configure.ac
>&amp;&amp;
>>> autogen.sh ...
>>>
>>> --DJ
>>>
>>
>> That sounds more correct to me. I have had several people report it
>on IRC.
>
>Did you get the sed correct?
>
>There are only three instances of pthread_stubs_possible in
>configure.ac. 
>  The sed uses:
>
>/pthread_stubs_possible=/
>
>Did you miss the = sign?
>

I won't say no,  but it is unlikely as it was copy and paste, but I'm not in 
front of a machine where I can test ATM. The result was similar to this block 
in configure:

....
if test "x$pthread_stubs_possible" == "xyes"; then

fi
....

--DJ


--DJ


-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to