On 24/01/2017 18:19, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:28:20AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
Please object if you think any of this is *wrong* (for 'inadequate'
the details can be corrected if they need to be), otherwise I will
go ahead and do this.
I don't have any real objections, however I am *slightly* concerned about
the balance of the book's level of detail about fonts compared to other
issues. For instance we really say very little about customization of
different desktop environments.
That said, users basically look at one page at a time so it probably doesn't
matter.
Go ahead.
Thanks - as with everything, I tend to use too many words, and there
is probably some detail which can go.
I'll give it a little while in case there are other comments.
+1. I like it. I agree we could give more details in some other areas,
too (printing and scanning, for example?). The main problem with details
is maintenance. Details tend to fluctuate more rapidly than the whole
picture...
Pierre
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
