On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 06:27:38PM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > On 24/01/2017 18:19, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > I'll give it a little while in case there are other comments. > > > > > +1. I like it. I agree we could give more details in some other areas, too > (printing and scanning, for example?). The main problem with details is > maintenance. Details tend to fluctuate more rapidly than the whole > picture... > > Pierre > I'm in favour of adding more details to help people get things working well. But the only DE I use to any extent is xfce - beyond adding a few plugins and sometimes adding a fifth desktop I don't think there is much that I alter.
Occasionally, people have added a few things to our wiki - but generally the configuration details which get recorded are only what an editor thought was important at the time. If users want to press for more details in any page, that would be good - mostly it's hard to get our users to say anything unless they have a problem. ĸen -- `I shall take my mountains', said Lu-Tze. `The climate will be good for them.' -- Small Gods -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
