On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 08:26:15PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > The SBU from gcc-6.3 / 2017-05-01 was 77.151s, my unreliable > > repeat-SBU is 90.892s which is only a 17% worsening (haswell i7). I > > note that is unreliable because my own scripts always seem to take a > > lot longer when running a repeat-SBU calculation - I've sat looking > > at them, but I can't see what takes the extra time. > > 77 seconds seems pretty fast to me if it is -j1. Mine is also a Haswell > (i7-5820K) and my time with gcc6.3 was 107 seconds. > Yes, that was with -j1, and a SATA SSD. > I did do some testing and got the time down to 82 seconds by passing -O0 (no > optimization), but that hosed the build times of virtually everything > afterward. That's not something I'd recommend. > > -- Bruce
Indeed not. ĸen -- I live in a city. I know sparrows from starlings. After that everything is a duck as far as I'm concerned. -- Monstrous Regiment -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
