On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 04:01:23PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 08/30/2018 03:52 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> > I just went to download ImageMagick-6.9.10-10 and failed, the 6.9.9
> > version is now -11. From the ChangeLog :
> >
> > 2018-08-27 6.9.10-11 Cristy <quetzlzacatenango@image...>
> > * Release ImageMagick version 6.9.10-11, GIT revision
> > 13802:5198c3b80:20180828
> >
> > 2018-08-15 6.9.10-11 Cristy <quetzlzacatenango@image...>
> > * Fixed numerous use of uninitialized values, integer overflow, memory
> > exceeded, and timeouts (credit to OSS Fuzz).
> > * Add support for "module" security policy.
> >
> > 2018-08-13 6.9.10-10 Cristy <quetzlzacatenango@image...>
> > * Release ImageMagick version 6.9.10-10, GIT revision
> > 13743:8f8009715:20180813
> >
> > Since this is before our release, I guess we ought to go with this
> > newer version ?
>
> IM changes often. We are liable to have -12 released within a week. IM6 is
> only used in emacs (optional) and inkscale (recommended) and both have been
> tagged.
>
> I'm inclined to not change what we have now, but can be persuaded otherwise.
>
> -- Bruce
To me, this looks like more of why we upgraded (uninitialized
values, and perhaps timeouts will cause an apparent DOS - but no
idea what in particular was involved).
I've resumed the build on my ryzen for this and inkscape, can pick
it up if the patch applies and you, or Douglas, wish.
Meanwhile, the slowcoach machine is building the full deps for
libreoffice to confirm no issues with reinstating system boost and
system openssl.
ĸen
--
Also Spuke Zerothruster
(Finnegans Wake)
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
