On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 02:53:50PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > There is a xine-ui-0.99.11 release, but it is unbuildable due to a call to a > non-existent function. Reviewing upstream, the activity seems very low. > The mailing lists for this package on sourceforge are less than informative. > I don't think any devs read them. >
I'm subscribed to xine-devel. Finding time to debug when a current version *breaks* is a different matter (presumably, a mercurial version). https://sourceforge.net/p/xine/mailman/xine-devel/?viewmonth=201907 And the xine website still says that 0.99.10 is the latest :) https://www.xine-project.org/home The website is a mess, still pointing to debian for hg repos, but those seem to be dead. The current development seems to be at http://hg.code.sf.net/p/xine/xine-ui but I guess you got the latest version of 0.99.11. > > Reviewing xine in the book, nothing depends on xine-ui and only opencv > depends on xine-libs. > > Is there any objection to archiving xine-ui? > > -- Bruce I would be disappointed to see it go - from past comparison to vlc (generally too loud!) or parole I got the impression that xine-ui gave better audio on (classical) music. When it works on mp4, it usually produces an accurate aspect ration, unlike parole which often decides to show 5:4 or square images. > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- thread 'main' panicked at 'giraffe', /tmp/rustc-1.32.0-src/src/test/run-fail/while-panic.rs:17:13 -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
