Le 06/03/2020 à 09:06, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev a écrit : > Le 06/03/2020 à 08:45, Pierre Labastie a écrit : >> Le 06/03/2020 à 00:29, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev a écrit : >>> Hello, >>> >>> On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 16:22 -0600, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote: >>>> [...] >>>> >>>> Check this out: >>>> >>>> https://marc.info/?l=util-linux-ng&m=158233347915676&w=2 >>>> >>>> This is due to glibc-2.31's y2038 changes, and also due to changes >>>> in >>>> the kernel's time API. >>> >>> >>> Does this mean, LFS-9.1.RC will kept the hwclock "malfunction"? >>> >>> (as long there is a "note" within the util-linux LFS page, >>> that could be quite acceptable). >>> >> >> LFS-9.1 is released, so there is not much we can do. I think this is fixed >> upstream: >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/util-linux/util-linux.git/commit/?id=cd781c405be82540484da3bfe3d3f17a39b8eb5c > > Sorry for sending the same patch again, I hadn't understood that "marc.info" > had it...
Maybe it is not worth it. Having the patch in the book will become useless when version 2.35.2 (or 2.36) is out. I've uploaded the patch to the patch repo, and maybe, it is better to just mention it in the errata and on the util-linux page. Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
