On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 07:58:30PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
> I know it would not bring much (decrease the number of packages by 3), but
> removing sawfish from the book would allow removing also librep and rep-gtk...
> Also rep-gtk depends on gtk+-2, and I think we should try to eliminate all the
> packages that depend on gtk+-2.
>
> Comment?
>
> Pierre
>
For the first point, I have no opinion - I don't use sawfish.
But for the second I think you are premature. Hell, we haven't even
got rid of python2 yet. ;-)
ĸen
--
#define THE_TRUTH_AND_THATS_CUTTIN_ME_OWN_THROAT true
Al Viro, complaining about a 'TRUE' macro in staging
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
