On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 02:19:03AM +0100, Uwe Düffert via blfs-dev wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, 15 Mar 2020, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> 
> > [...] after I've worked out why I cannot get
> > libreoffice to build ;-)
> What's the problem? libreoffice-6.4.2.2 built flawlessly for me with the sed
> I needed to get libreoffice-6.4.2.1 to build - which I posted March 4th!?
> 
> Uwe

Hi Uwe,

I know you posted those fixes for later versions, but I've been
trying not to change too much in this experimental build (5.6-rc5
headers from last week, JS68 tried but removed and reverted to JS60
because polkit didn't like it (sysv, not systemd), rustc-1.39.0 and
primarily librsvg-1.39.0.

So I'm still using LO-6.4.0.3.  After a couple of minutes it failed
without any message except Error 2.  Looking at the log (now
overwritten by a successful build) I got the impression it was
running python.

This LFS system has python-3.8.2.  I added your latest sed, on the
assumption that poppler-0.86.1 was probably why you had needed that,
and I've now removed '---enable-python-system'.  With those changes
the build worked.

ĸen
-- 
When alle is ſayed and all is done, ye must chooſe your faces wisely,
for soon enouff ye will be playing with fyre."
  The Nice and Accurate Prophecies of Agnes Nutter, Prophecy 5004
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to