On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:03:05AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 12/11/20 12:40 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-12-11 at 02:43 +0000, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:

> > 
> > Yes I've been bitten by that when trying to build LXQt. Note that it
> > has nothing to do with jhalfs. Either put Attic instead of stable, or
> > use a later version.
> 
> Of course with a later version of kf5/plasma all the md5sums are different.
> 
>   -- Bruce

For plasma in particular, do not the dependencies (and perhaps even
the available tarballs) change over time, so that we ought to stick
to the current versions of both for the moment ?

More generally, our releases are frozen at a point in time, and
subject to errata.  If a url becomes unusable, do we not fix that
in the development book and add an erratum ?

Pierre has explained to me on alfs-discuss about the jhalfs issue
with kf5, I'll maybe come back to that next week.

ĸen
-- 
To say that it (his hair) was black and bound up in a ponytail is to
miss the opportunity of using the term 'elephantine'. It was hair
with personality.  -- The Thief Of Time (about the monk, Sato).
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to