Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Declan Moriarty wrote:
> 
> > >  Did the cursor work adequately on 2.6 in the past ?
> > >
> > Never. But I never used 2.6 much.
> >
> > >  Which version of 2.6 are you now using, and which was your
> > >  previous working version ?
> >
> > 2.6.12.1.
> >
> > 2.6.0, 2.6.9, & 2.6.10 all showed the same thing.
> >
> 
>  So, this isn't a regression within 2.6.

No, it not. It appears to be a regression 2.4 --> 2.6 :-)

> 
> > Next bit of spare time I'll stick the framebuffer back in. I have
> > memories that 1. The radeon card responds strangely to the radeon
> > module.  2. I have downgraded the monitor to a cheap/nasty type
> > which may not do what the previous one did.
> 
>  Perhaps try CONFIG_FB_SOFT_CURSOR and CONFIG_FB_MODE_HELPERS with
>  CONFIG_FB_RADEON and CONFIG_FB_RADEON_I2C and make sure any other
>  framebuffers are not set.  Apart from some junk in the early visual
>  output up to maybe 2.6.7, and a missing penguin around 2.6.9 or
>  2.6.10, the radeon has worked well here as a console framebuffer
>  during 2.6.
> 
>  In xorg.conf, I use
>       Driver          "radeon"
> (not "ati", not "fb")
> 
>  You may find that the bootargs I quoted for the radeon are wrong -
>  another box of mine uses video=radeonfb:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - they both seem
>  to give me a 128x48 framebuffer console, at least when I don't use a
>  graphical login.
> 
> 

I can fart around with arguments and options for the video. I'm not
scared of that. I did get fed up trying to master this curcor thing, so
I stuck in the ALFS stuff, wiped my 3.3 libs, logs includes, and
executables, and had chapter 6 & 7 of LFS-6.0 build themselves last
evening. The thing knew best, of course. It stuck in UDEV(!) after me
loudly say6ing "That will never work - ever". Of course it decided I
wanted HOTPLUG (Aaaargh!) and I just have hung on the bootscripts for
some reason.

That will give me an LFS-6.0, and then I have the BLFS-6.0 profile there
for another bit of work. At least I will prove if the problem is system
specific.

Mind you, I have to send this & reboot into a 2.6 kernel to build. I got
an error from the toolchain (Glibc IIRC)
FATAL: kernel too old when I was running 2.4.22

-- 

        With best Regards,


        Declan Moriarty.
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to