Jeremy Byron wrote:
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
The book says PAM is optional, but openoffice's configure script
errors when it can't find PAM.
This was my slipup. It was supposed to be moved to Required untill I
had time to build up another LFS and test the patch. Others have done
that for me now.
configure's --help doesn't show a way to disable pam. Should PAM be
listed as required in the book?
It requires a patch similar to the OOo_1.1.4-no_pam-1.patch except that
it also has to remove a big chunk of code from the configure script (so
it doesn't check for PAM and fail). There isn't a --disable-pam option,
unfortunately. The patch should still be in the archives somewhere from
when I was playing with OOo2 a while back; I don't have access to it at
the moment to attach it.
It is optional (with the patch) in the same way as it's optional for
OOo_1.1.4 in the stable branch.
Regards,
Jeremy.
Yes, it'll be in the book momentarily. The patch is in the patches repo
already. First round of changes on the way. Unfortunately, it looks
like the assert errors are a glibc problem in both 2.3.4 and 2.3.5. I'm
still investigating...and that doesn't explain why this works in my case
as I do _not_ have the patch in my glibc....there are others, but
nothing related to tls or dlopen.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
