On 4/26/06, DJ Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan Nicholson wrote: > > > This is because gcc doesn't know about /opt/lib. The path used for ld > > is only for NEEDED libraries. > > OMG. What is sad is that I just corrected a similar problem less than > 10 hours ago. :-|
Ahh, these things happen. If it makes you feel better, the ldapdb based mail server that I wrote so authoritatively last night isn't working. > To top it off, the reason that the > second test case appeared to work is still unknow....though in light fo > my lack of attention, it was a dummy error. What happens in that situation with -Wl,--verbose? > > I'm not really sure why the LFS book creates > > /opt/lib and friends. > > FHS, though I don't interpret the text as required: > http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#OPTADDONAPPLICATIONSOFTWAREPACKAGES Well, I guess I knew the reason. I don't agree with it, though. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
