On 5/4/06, Henry christenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/4/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Henry christenson wrote these words on 05/04/06 20:56 CST:
>
> > oops i forgot to mention that i was using CLFS thats using gcc 4x.
> > current blfs version is 2.10.
>
> Sigh.....
>
> The above is meaningless. I was trying to be helpful. You are
> trying to use development LFS with stable (I think) GNOME. Please
> try and use something that matches.
>
> Unfortunately, CLFS doesn't match any BLFS version. You are sort of
> on your own there. CLFS has elected to use Glibc and GCC that isn't
> part of LFS right now. So, nobody has tested anything you are
> attempting.
>
> Writing into the list looking for support is fine. Writing in with
> issues and not identifying you are using CLFS is a sin.
>
> --
> Randy
>
> rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.28] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
> [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686]
> 21:02:00 up 40 days, 8:39, 1 user, load average: 0.03, 0.02, 0.02
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>
Wasent looking for support just giving information.
Also i was forced to use CLFS because of a kernel issue with timeing
and amd/ATI wierdness. However that issue looks like its been
resloved. I will try gnome 2.14 build with my gcc4 and see if i can
get anywhere with that. I am happy to say gnome has little to no
issues with x86_64 tho.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
