On 5/26/06, Peter B. Steiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nope, I'm still sticking with gcc 3.x until 4.x no longer requires patching the source (of target applications) to build stuff.
Maybe you can use gcc-2 to drop that pesky net-tools patch. :) Seriously, any package that hasn't been fixed for gcc-4's stricter syntax by now is borderline unmaintained. Everything else has a well known workaround. I wouldn't let that prevent me from using the newer compiler. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
