On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 02:07:57PM +0100, michael lang wrote: > So I finally got around to checking this, I found some interesting things in > the xorg.log, but they may just be useless.
I wasn't following this, because I know nothing about SDL, but I have used xorg on (non-PCI-E) radeons. > > first: > (II) Primary Device is: PCI 03:00:0 > (--) Assigning device section with no busID to primary device > (WW) RADEON: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:3:0:1) found > > Doesn't look harmful, but perhaps your udev isn't configured correctly? The > device does get loaded though > Nothing to do with udev. Radeon obviously didn't need the (commented?) busID. It then moans about the second device - that is normal for the radeons I've used (7500, 9200se). They seem to have an extra hardware device, and it doesn't get configured - doesn't cause any harm, as far as I know. > drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 > drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address) > drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address) > drmOpenDevice: Open failed > drmOpenByBusid: Searching for BusID pci:0000:03:00.0 > drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 > drmOpenDevice: open result is 7, (OK) > drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns 7 > drmOpenByBusid: drmGetBusid reports pci:0000:03:00.0 > > Same as before, is your udev configured correctly? Or is it just some weird > PCI-E thing... It does seem to open something as 'card0' at the second attempt, probably working ok (note: I wasn't following the thread, so I don't know what problem was being discussed). I don't recall having to change udev rules for dri, although the Xorg.conf obviously does need it. Radeon is a particularly verbose driver. > > (II) RADEON(0): I2C device "DDC:ddc2" registered at address 0xA0. > (II) RADEON(0): I2C device "DDC:ddc2" removed. > (II) RADEON(0): I2C device "DDC:ddc2" registered at address 0xA0. > (II) RADEON(0): I2C device "DDC:ddc2" removed. > (II) RADEON(0): I2C device "DDC:ddc2" registered at address 0xA0. > (II) RADEON(0): I2C device "DDC:ddc2" removed. > (II) RADEON(0): DDC Type: 2, Detected Type: 0 > > Now this strikes me as weird, but I have no idea what it does. Just want to > point it out, for who knows what happens if you mess with it Something for getting EDID info for the attached monitor. I've just checked one of my radeon boxes - I only get one set of registered/removed, but I wouldn't worry about that. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
