On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 08:11:47PM +0200, Gerhard Erker wrote: > Hello, > I have a clfs-System (pure_64) and want to install the x-server. > When configuring i got the following error: > > dlopen: /usr/lib/X11/modules/drivers/atimisc_drv.so: undefined symbol: > ATIMemoryTypeNames_88800CX > (EE) Failed to load /usr/lib/X11/modules/drivers/atimisc_drv.so > (EE) Failed to load module "atimisc" (loader failed, 7) > > Am I have this problem because i'm working with 64 bits and have i to compile > the driver or the server with special flags? > And can someone tell me the right flags? > I haven't seen this, but google found one debian bug where the reporter claimed to be using the "atimisc" driver (I would expect to see "ati"), and a bunch of gentoo reports that were perhaps fixed by building a bit less in the kernel.
On my radeon9200se I'm running 7.2 in pure64, with the 6.6.3 driver - the release announcement at http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg-announce/2006-October/000137.html suggests it will be good for 7.1 as well as 7.2, so if all else fails, you could try that. For my kernel I have CONFIG_AGP=y CONFIG_AGP_AMD64=y CONFIG_DRM=y CONFIG_DRM_RADEON=y Looking at menuconfig in 2.6.22-rc5, this boils down to selecting Direct Rendering Manager and AtI Radeon under 'Character devices', the AGP part seems to be automatic (at least in 2.6.22-rc5). As far as I can see, the only thing I've had to do differently on x86_64 was in Mesa: sed -i -e 's/savage //' -i -e 's/ ffb$//' configs/linux-dri But you would have noticed if you didn't have that and needed it, because Mesa would have failed to build. All I can say for certain is that I didn't need to pass any different flags for the driver or the server ;) ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
