> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alessandro Alocci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "BLFS Support List" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Good video editor for linux? > Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:17:59 +0200 > > > On Tuesday 26 June 2007 18:28:08 Lauri Kasanen wrote: > > > It seems there are three good video editors for Linux: Kino, Lives and > > Avidemux. I tried building Avidemux 2.4pre1 and when it didn't work, 2.3. > > Because it had the least dependencies from those three (KDE for kino and > > mplayer+transcode+imagemagick+stuff for lives) > > Hi, kino is a gtk+ based program, it doesn't require qt/kde at all > despite the initial k :-) > and should be not so problematic to compile it. > It can be very useful if you need to acquire your video > from a camera. > By the way, what kind of problems you had compiling > Avidemux-2.4pre1, out of curiosity I have just tried > to compile it (in a recent LFS based system) but I haven't > seen any problem. > (Besides, it seems that this version has a bundled internal version of > js/spidermonkey, so you don't need to have it installed in your system.) > > > Can you recommend any other video editor (for joining several mpeg-1 videos > > to one with transition effects?) or can you help me build Avidemux? > > As said in previous posts you can try cinelerra, I also have > a svn version installed. > > HTH, A. Alocci > --
Yes, I remembered wrong about Kino.. But it still needs a lot of libs I don't have.. Thinking about disk space here ;) First, it said it found X includes in /usr/X11R7/include and libs in /usr/X11R7/lib, but it still made the flag -L/usr/X11R6/lib. Solved that with a quick sed. But then make stopped with Fontconfig errors, and I did a make clean and a new configure (this time I looked at the configure output more). It had messages like these for at least lame, ogg vorbis, fontconfig..: looking for lame.h..found lame.h usable checking if LAME_MP3_INIT is in lame.h....no So it found all the libs, but it thought they missed some symbols, so it didn't add the linking flags. All the versions were newer than required (lame 3.97 vs 3.91 for example), so maybe that's the problem. (Why is gtk2-2.1.x newer than 2.6.x? Another weird naming policy..) I've had no errors like these, Xmms compiled fine with both vorbis and lame.. Lauri -- _______________________________________________ Surf the Web in a faster, safer and easier way: Download Opera 9 at http://www.opera.com Powered by Outblaze -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
