On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 15:54 +0200, Lauri Kasanen wrote: > (Why is gtk2-2.1.x newer than 2.6.x? Another weird naming policy..)
Is that a typo? 2.1.x certainly isn't newer than 2.6.x. If you meant to ask why 2.12.x is newer than 2.6.x, that's simply enough - because 12 is greater than 6. Simon.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
