Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 02:33:59PM -0600, DJ Lucas wrote:
>> I'll give it a shot and see what happens.  I don't know where it is 
>> pulled in yet...will get a look at it and add to my patch.
>>
>  Forgot to ask: what is your patch doing ?  I did some playing
> around myself (as noted earlier), but in the end I'm not patching
> xulrunner (with system nspr and nss), and only patching firefox
> itself if building with gnomevfs on top of xulrunner.
> 

Just a patch for the nss/nspr combo adding the {nss,nspr}-config and 
{nss,nspr}.pc files.

>  As for everyone dealing with nss/nspr issues, "good luck", you'll
> need it!

I should note that I'm using nss-3.12 with nspr-4.7.0.  Gentoo appears 
to have it down using a separate nspr-4.7.1.  AFAIK, SourceMage is still 
having problems as well.  There was a bug report on Gentoo's lists with 
the same errors, and supposedly there was an as-needed patch for nss 
that fixed the issue.

Only thing that I've found even partially related is the gcc-3/4 
visibility patch, but shouldn't be related IIUC.  I've looked but have 
been unable to locate any 'as-needed' patch for any of the mozilla 
products in either the e-builds or the list of patches in the Portage 
tree.  I've sent a request to the SM maintainer to see what he has come 
up with for it.

Though probably unrelated, I'm ripping out nss/nspr now and I'll be 
using a separate nss and nspr.  Probably as the book should do too given 
that nspr is moving along faster than nss.

-- DJ Lucas

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to