On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 19:09 +0000, Hops Error, Line 21, alcoholi.c wrote: > Playing the what-if game, though, if one day eglibc actually managed a > proven high degree of binary compatibility, would there be > instructions here? In my opinion it is a possibility, with a few > popular distros full of complaining customers and other motivators > switching over.
As I said in my other message, it would never make sense for Eglibc to feature in *BLFS*. However, it's not at all unreasonable to suggest that *LFS* might switch to it at some future date. CLFS already does, and if other distros follow Debian's lead, I imaging LFS would probably do so as well. Simon.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
