Sorry to hear that your mutt has a bad case of indigestion. (Hey, even mutt's developers couldn't refrain from the corny jokes, as you know from reading the man page....)
I can't be of much help to you, as I never subscribe via digest. I did find this snippet on a mail-server FAQ: > 6.21 My Mutt users cannot thread their digest messages > The digest by default removed non-essential headers like > ‘In-Reply-To:’ from messages. Modern MUAs, like Mutt can split out > messages from a digest and then thread them based on such headers. To > include these and all other headers in the digest messages, use the > ‘v’ or ‘n’ format as described on the ezmlm-get(1) man page. > Normally, the threading done by ezmlm is sufficient and the default > format preferred to reduce message and digest size, often by 25% or > more. Check to see if those headers have indeed been removed. If so, I guess you could complain to the list maintainer. Or perhaps write an awk script or similar to re-insert the relevant ones. If you were using procmail, you could feed digests to the script on a list-by-list basis. Just thinking out loud; sounds like a half-vast project... Good luck! Scott Swanson PS: Tell me about links -g. I used to use zgv, but I can't seem to get it working on newer systems. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
