On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:58:07AM -0700, Scott wrote: > Sorry to hear that your mutt has a bad case of indigestion. (Hey, even > mutt's developers couldn't refrain from the corny jokes, as you know > from reading the man page....) > > I can't be of much help to you, as I never subscribe via digest. I did > find this snippet on a mail-server FAQ: > > > 6.21 My Mutt users cannot thread their digest messages > > > The digest by default removed non-essential headers like > > ?In-Reply-To:? from messages. Modern MUAs, like Mutt can split out > > messages from a digest and then thread them based on such headers. To > > include these and all other headers in the digest messages, use the > > ?v? or ?n? format as described on the ezmlm-get(1) man page. > > Normally, the threading done by ezmlm is sufficient and the default > > format preferred to reduce message and digest size, often by 25% or > > more. > > Check to see if those headers have indeed been removed. If so, I guess > you could complain to the list maintainer. Or perhaps write an awk > script or similar to re-insert the relevant ones. If you were using > procmail, you could feed digests to the script on a list-by-list > basis. Just thinking out loud; sounds like a half-vast project... > > Good luck! > Scott Swanson > > PS: Tell me about links -g. I used to use zgv, but I can't seem to get > it working on newer systems. > > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page
I switched from digest mode to single mailings last night, and I think this may work better with my setup. This is a reply to a single mail;hopefully it will end up in the right place. I use links2 from Twibright labs.You can run it in the console with fb drivers or either X. It has a text mode like lynx and a graphical mode if enabled.I have only used it with vesafb, so I can't say how it works with other drivers.If you already have X installed there are better alternatives for a lightweight browser. Dillo is one that I have used. The blfs book has a section on installation. If you are used to the bells and whistles of a heavyweight browser, it will probably be disappointing, but if you just "need to see pictures" it works fine. Thanks for the feedback and humor. Mike H. --- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
