On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 06:29:47PM -0500, scrat wrote: > I have compiled and installed X and I get this in the log file > > Can somebody help me read this ? > > > Backtrace: > [ 914.629] 0: /usr/bin/X (xorg_backtrace+0x3b) [0x80e75eb] > [ 914.629] 1: /usr/bin/X (0x8048000+0x5d8b5) [0x80a58b5] > [ 914.629] 2: (vdso) (__kernel_rt_sigreturn+0x0) [0xb772a40c] > [ 914.629] 3: /usr/lib/X11/modules/extensions/libglx.so > (0xb720c000+0x40860) [0xb724c860] > [ 914.629] 4: /usr/lib/X11/modules/extensions/libglx.so > (0xb720c000+0x376f8) [0xb72436f8] > [ 914.629] 5: /usr/bin/X (InitExtensions+0x9d) [0x80cbedd] > [ 914.629] 6: /usr/bin/X (0x8048000+0x1a152) [0x8062152] > [ 914.629] 7: /lib/libc.so.6 (__libc_start_main+0xe6) [0xb7363de6] > [ 914.629] 8: /usr/bin/X (0x8048000+0x19ed1) [0x8061ed1] > [ 914.629] Segmentation fault at address (nil) > [ 914.629] > Fatal server error: > [ 914.629] Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault). Server aborting > [ 914.629] > [ 914.629] > > I beleve that xorg-server is the one seg faulting, should I rebuild xorg > server or is this much deeper rooted?
Hard to say :-( Since libglx is shipped as part of the server, I agree with your belief that the server package is segfaulting. What worries me is 'at address (nil)'. That implies a null pointer is being followed. Was X working ok before this happened, or are you still at the "test the build and the configuration" stage ? What video card are you using, and which version of the server and the video driver ? ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
