On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:31:29PM -0500, [email protected] wrote: > > Am 23.03.2012 um 07:11 schrieb Ken Moffat: > > Hi Ken, > > I'll be trying to comment (answer?) along the lines you > took this thread to. > > > You have Python-2.6 and 2.7 ? > > 3.1.3 and 3.2.2 as well. >
Brave man! I used Mesa-7.11.2 on my most recent build with LFS-7.1, Armin's update to 8.0.1 came later. I've just remembered that Nathan pointed to http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg19705.html earlier this week, after a comment on -dev. Looks like 8.0.1 was the problem. 8.0.2 has been released, so I suggest anyone who is building Mesa tries 8.0.2 instead of 8.0.1. [...] > > 2. Judging (or misjudging) by the lukewarm response to my > OP, Python and its derivatives seem to be a bit of a black > art to the other (B)LFS denizens too. > I certainly have no intention of making a career out of it, > despite its apparent popularity in certain circles (as we know, > a lot of interesting packages depend on one Python version > or another as well). > And certainly I don't blame anybody less than enthusiastic about it. > To be fair, the problem appears to be limited to that version of MesaLib, and something similar is affecting pygobject-3. People are more likely to respond if they've seen the problem themself. > [...] > All I can say about my seven odd years of installing packages > left and right following the excellent (B)LFS instructions > is that as you can see, I've lived to e-mail about it. > :-) As you say, backups are important. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
