Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 02:19:50PM +0100, Andrew Benton wrote: >> I wonder if we should put cairo-1.10.2 back in the book. In my opinion >> cairo-1.12.0 is too buggy. Personally I'll continue to use cairo-1.12.0 >> on my main system as I want to get to the bottom of this, but for the >> foreseeable future I'll use cairo-1.10.2 on the other computers (used by >> family).
> Now that there is no doubt that there are problems with it, and we > don't know how to fix them, then we ought to revert it to 1.10.2. > Or does some other package need 1.12.0 ? Indeed, from the discussion, there seems to be too many problems with 1.12.0 reported. I would also say that we should revert to 1.10.2 and do some extra testing before updating again. Searching the web, I see problems reported for Arch, Ubuntu, Debian. For example: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666538 I think this has high enough visibility that it will be fixed fairly soon. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
