>> Yes, I'd agree with that. Broadly speaking, what I think people want >> are either specific applications like Firefox which we cover along >> with the dependencies, or broader packages like Gnome or KDE which we >> cover as entire sections. In what way is the current system not >> adequate? > > Isn't the posting by Mr(s) Oda at the head of this thread > evidence enough?
Not really, no. A single person posting a question doesn't mean much. Do you, personally, see an actual problem with the "open BLFS index, search for name of package like Firefox, click and go down dependencies" approach? I know that's exactly what I did when *I* was a newbie, and it worked fine. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
